Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 09:25

Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
'The Walking Dead: Dead City' finale ending with Negan and Maggie explained - Entertainment Weekly
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why do older people have a hard time using technology?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Aaron Rodgers Is Married Now - The Cut
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why does Africa have all mineral resources but she is suffering economically?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Would the word literate carry the same meaning with public (common wealth) in 1900 vs today 2020?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Dave Chappelle and Mo Amer on Politics and Comedy, SNL Monologues - Variety